|
1. Goldstein EB, Brockmole J. Sensation and perception. Ninth ed: Cengage Learning; 2016. P. 5-8. 2. Hanks TD, Summerfield C. Perceptual decision making in rodents, monkeys, and humans. Neuron. 2017; 93(1): 15-31. [ DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2016.12.003] 3. Summerfield C, Tsetsos K. Building bridges between perceptual and economic decision-making: neural and computational mechanisms. Frontiers in neuroscience. 2012; 6: 70. [ DOI:10.3389/fnins.2012.00070] 4. Bruce V, Green PR, Georgeson MA. Visual perception: Physiology, psychology, & ecology. Psychology Press; 2003. p. 151-2. 5. Herzog MH, Kammer T, Scharnowski F. Time slices: what is the duration of a percept? PLoS Biology. 2016; 14(4): e1002433. [ DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002433] 6. Arstila V, Georgescu AL, Pesonen H, Lunn D, Noreika V, Falter-Wagner CM. Event timing in human vision: Modulating factors and independent functions. PLoS One. 2020; 15(8): e0226122. [ DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0226122] 7. Poggel DA, Strasburger H. Visual perception in space and time-mapping the visual field of temporal resolution. Acta neurobiologiae experimentalis. 2004; 64(3): 427-37. 8. Rutschmann R. Perception of temporal order and relative visual latency. Science. 1966; 152(3725): 1099-101. [ DOI:10.1126/science.152.3725.1099] 9. Reeves A. Temporal resolution in visual perception. Handbook of perception and action. 1: Elsevier; 1996. P. 11-24. [ DOI:10.1016/S1874-5822(96)80004-1] 10. Amano K, Goda N, Nishida Sy, Ejima Y, Takeda T, Ohtani Y. Estimation of the timing of human visual perception from magnetoencephalography. Journal of Neuroscience. 2006; 26(15): 3981-91. [ DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4343-05.2006] 11. Nothdurft H-C. Dynamic differences in the cued identification of orientation, color, and facial expressions. VPL-reports; 2020. P. 1-27. 12. Rahnev D, Denison RN. Suboptimality in perceptual decision making. Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2018; 41: 1-66. [ DOI:10.1017/S0140525X18000936] 13. Kiani R, Churchland AK, Shadlen MN. Integration of direction cues is invariant to the temporal gap between them. Journal of Neuroscience. 2013; 33(42): 16483-9. [ DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2094-13.2013] 14. Tohidi-Moghaddam M, Zabbah S, Ebrahimpour R. The role of the primary information on importance of the last information in decision making. Neurosci J Shefaye Khatam. 2016; 4: 26-34. [ DOI:10.18869/acadpub.shefa.4.4.26] 15. Liu T, Pleskac TJ. Neural correlates of evidence accumulation in a perceptual decision task. Journal of neurophysiology. 2011; 106(5): 2383-98. [ DOI:10.1152/jn.00413.2011] 16. Shooshtari SV, Sadrabadi JE, Azizi Z, Ebrahimpour R. Confidence representation of perceptual decision by eeg and eye data in a random dot motion task. Neuroscience. 2019; 406: 510-27. [ DOI:10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.03.031] 17. Britten KH, Shadlen MN, Newsome WT, Movshon JA. The analysis of visual motion: a comparison of neuronal and psychophysical performance. Journal of Neuroscience. 1992; 12(12): 4745-65. [ DOI:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.12-12-04745.1992] 18. Zylberberg A, Fetsch CR, Shadlen MN. The influence of evidence volatility on choice, reaction time and confidence in a perceptual decision. Elife. 2016; 5: e17688. [ DOI:10.7554/eLife.17688] 19. Beck VM, Hollingworth A, Luck SJ. Simultaneous control of attention by multiple working memory representations. Psychological science. 2012; 23(8): 887-98. [ DOI:10.1177/0956797612439068] |
