[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal & Policies
Editorial Board
Articles Archive::
Current Issue
All Issues
Guide for Authors::
Author instructions
Guide for publishing in journal
Submission Form
Author's consent form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Ethical Statements::
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
::
Indexed by
    
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Copyright Policies

 

AWT IMAGE

 
..
Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

..
:: Volume 10, Issue 1 (Winter 2021) ::
Shefaye Khatam 2021, 10(1): 45-55 Back to browse issues page
The Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Empathy and Moral Judgment of Children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder
Farhad Ghadiri sourman abadi * , Khoshdavi Ebrahimzadeh , Soraya Anvari anbi , Nasim Ghazanfari
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran , farhadghadiri17@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (4743 Views)
Introduction: Oppositional defiant disorder (ODD) is one of the most common destructive behavioral disorders. Today, non-invasive methods, such as transcranial direct-current stimulation (tDCS), to control and improve the symptoms of various disorders have found a special place and may have advantages over drug treatments. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of tDCS on empathy and moral assessment of children with ODD. Materials and Methods: The research design is semi-experimental with a post-test pre-test with the control group. The statistical population of the study was all 8-11 years old boys with ODD in primary schools in Urmia, Iran in 2019-2020. Out of the total target population, by multistage cluster sampling, 30 students with ODD were selected using ODD Rating Scale (Hommersen et al, 2006), and randomly assigned into two experimental (n=15) and control (n=15) groups, then Griffith Empathy Measure (Bryant, 1982) and Moral Judgment Test (Synha & Warma, 1998) were completed by the participants. Descriptive statistics and univariate Analysis of Variance were used to analyze the data. Results: The results of this study showed that the application of tDCS significantly improved empathy and moral judgment compared to the control group. Conclusion: The study implies that psychologists and therapists may use tDCS along with other treatments to improve empathy and moral judgment of children with ODD.
Keywords: Cortical Excitability, Judgment, Empathy
Full-Text [PDF 873 kb]   (970 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research --- Open Access, CC-BY-NC | Subject: Cognitive Neuroscience
References
1. Farazmand M, Aghapour M. Effectiveness of Cognitive Emotional Training on Psychological Capitals in the Students with Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). Social Behavior Research & Health. 2020; 4(1):497-505 [DOI:10.18502/sbrh.v4i1.2829]
2. Ganji M, Ganji H. Psycology of exceptional children based on DSM-5. Savalan Publications. Tehran.2013. [Persian]
3. Szentiványi D, Balázs J. Quality of life in children and adolescents with symptoms or diagnosis of conduct disorder or oppositional defiant disorder. Mental Health & Prevention. 2018; 1(10): 1-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.mhp.2018.02.001]
4. Burke JD, Waldman I, Lahey BB. Predictive validity of childhood oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder: implications for the DSM-V. Journal of Abnormal Psychology. 2010; 119(4):739. [DOI:10.1037/a0019708]
5. Abdolmohammadi K, Ghadiri Sourman Abadi F, Choubdari A, Seyed Pourmand NS. Paranoid Thoughts and Self-esteem in Students with Oppositional Defiant Disorder (ODD). J Child Ment Health. 2018; 5(3): 137-145.
6. Amini Naghani S, Najarpourian S, and Samavi SA. Comparing the Effectiveness of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program and Parenting Program of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy on Parent-Child Relationship and Self-efficacy of Mothers With Oppositional Defiant Disorder Children. Journal of Research and Health. 2020; 10(2): 111-122. [DOI:10.32598/JRH.10.2.7]
7. Gopin CB, Berwid O, Marks DJ, Mlodnicka A, Halperin JM. ADHD preschoolers with and without ODD: do they act differently depending on degree of task engagement/reward?. Journal of attention disorders. 2013; 17(7): 608-19. [DOI:10.1177/1087054711432140]
8. Farzadi F, Behroozy N, Faramarzi H. Comparison of Theory of Mind, Attention Maintenance and Sympathy in Students with and Without Oppositional Defiant Disorder. J Child Ment Health. 2017; 3(4): 70-79.
9. Davis MH. A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog Sel. Doc. Psychol. 1980; 10:85.
10. Trimmer E, McDonald S, Rushby JA. Not knowing what I feel: Emotional empathy in autism spectrum disorders. Autism. 2017; 21(4): 450-7. [DOI:10.1177/1362361316648520]
11. Pavey L, Greitemeyer T, Sparks P. I help because I want to, not because you tell me to empathy increases autonomously motivated helping. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. 2012; 38(5): 681-9. [DOI:10.1177/0146167211435940]
12. Borb M. Building Moral Intelligence. San Francisco: Jossey Bas; 2001.
13. Matthys W, Lochman JE. Oppositional defiant disorder and conduct disorder in childhood. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. [DOI:10.1002/9780470684382]
14. Kempes M, Matthys W, Maassen G, van Goozen S, van Engeland H. A parent questionnaire for distinguishing between reactive and proactive aggression in children. European child & adolescent psychiatry. 2006; 15(1): 38-45. [DOI:10.1007/s00787-006-0502-2]
15. Cristofani C, Sesso G, Cristofani P, Fantozzi P, Inguaggiato E, Muratori P, Narzisi A, Pfanner C, Pisano S, Polidori L, Ruglioni L. The Role of Executive Functions in the Development of Empathy and Its Association with Externalizing Behaviors in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders and Other Psychiatric Comorbidities. Brain Sciences. 2020; 10(8): 489. [DOI:10.3390/brainsci10080489]
16. Kendall PC. Childhood disorders. Psychology Press; 2000.
17. Zionts P. Teaching disturbed and disturbing students: An integrative approach. Pro-Ed, 8700 Shoal Creek Blvd., Austin, TX 78757-6897; 1996.
18. farajzadeh Dehkordi H. How Personality and Gender Relate to Ethical Judgment of Accountants: Evidence based on Discipline. journal of Value & Behavioral Accounting. 2019;4(7): 181-208. [DOI:10.29252/aapc.4.7.181]
19. Iman-nejad M, Iman-Zade A, Taqi-pur K, Tahmasb-zade Sheikhlar D. The Effectiveness of Teaching Philosophy to Adolescents on Development of Aesthetic Beliefs and Moral Judgments of High School Students through Philosophical Community of Inquiry. qaiie. 2020; 4(4): 37-68.
20. Herrero García P, Carbonero MÁ, Martín Antón LJ. The Moral Competence of Spanish Councilors. Sustainability. 2020; 12(13): 5350. [DOI:10.3390/su12135350]
21. Raine A, Yang Y. Neural foundations to moral reasoning and antisocial behavior. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 2006; 1(3): 203-13. [DOI:10.1093/scan/nsl033]
22. Robertson D, Snarey J, Ousley O, Harenski K, Bowman FD, Gilkey R, Kilts C. The neural processing of moral sensitivity to issues of justice and care. Neuropsychologia. 2007; 45(4): 755-66. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.08.014]
23. Latan H, Jabbour CJ, Lopes de Sousa Jabbour AB. Ethical awareness, ethical judgment, andwhistleblowing: A moderated mediation analysis. Partial Least Squares Path Modeling: Basic Concepts, Methodological Issues and Applications. 2017:311-37. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-64069-3_15]
24. Mohammad Esmaiel E. A study and compare on moral development of Normal Adolescent and Conduct Disorders. JOEC. 2005; 5(1): 19-30.
25. American Psychiatric. Association Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), fifth edition, (DSM-5). Washington, DC London ,England, American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013: 309-11.
26. Davidson MA. ADHD in adults: a review of the literature. Journal of attention disorders. 2008; 11: 628-641. [DOI:10.1177/1087054707310878]
27. Noordermeer SD, Luman M, Greven CU, Veroude K, Faraone SV, Hartman CA, Hoekstra PJ, Franke B, Buitelaar JK, Heslenfeld DJ, Oosterlaan J. Structural brain abnormalities of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder with oppositional defiant disorder. Biological Psychiatry. 2017; 82(9): 642-50. [DOI:10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.07.008]
28. Snoek H, Van Goozen SH, Matthys W, Sigling HO, Koppeschaar HP, Westenberg HG, Van Engeland H. Serotonergic functioning in children with oppositional defiant disorder: a sumatriptan challenge study. Biological Psychiatry. 2002; 51(4): 319-25. [DOI:10.1016/S0006-3223(01)01230-6]
29. Serra-Pinheiro MA, Schmitz M, Mattos P, Souza I. Oppositional defiant disorder: a review of neurobiological and environmental correlates, comorbidities, treatment and prognosis. Brazilian Journal of Psychiatry. 2004; 26(4): 273-6. [DOI:10.1590/S1516-44462004000400013]
30. Sergiou CS, Woods AJ, Franken IH, van Dongen JD. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) as an intervention to improve empathic abilities and reduce violent behavior in forensic offenders: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2020; 21(1): 1-4. [DOI:10.1186/s13063-020-4074-0]
31. Yamada Y, Sumiyoshi T. Neurobiological mechanisms of transcranial direct current stimulation for psychiatric disorders; Neurophysiological, chemical, and anatomical considerations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2021; 4(15): 21. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2021.631838]
32. DaSilva AF, Volz MS, Bikson M, Fregni F. Electrode positioning and montage in transcranial direct current stimulation. JoVE (Journal of Visualized Experiments). 2011; 23(51): e2744. [DOI:10.3791/2744]
33. Yokoi Y, Narita Z, Sumiyoshi T. Transcranial direct current stimulation in depression and psychosis: a systematic review. Clinical EEG and neuroscience. 2018; 49(2): 93-102. [DOI:10.1177/1550059417732247]
34. Ashrafi H, Khadijeh Arab S, Zare H, Elmi Mansesh N. The Effectiveness of Transcranial direct-current stimulationon the improvement of visual and auditory attention in People with attention deficit-hyperactivity disorder(ADHD). JOEC. 2019; 18(4): 19-30.
35. Rêgo GG, Lapenta OM, Marques LM, Costa TL, Leite J, Carvalho S, Gonçalves ÓF, Brunoni AR, Fregni F, Boggio PS. Hemispheric dorsolateral prefrontal cortex lateralization in the regulation of empathy for pain. Neuroscience letters. 2015; 6(594): 12-6. [DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2015.03.042]
36. Coll MP, Tremblay MP, Jackson PL. The effect of tDCS over the right temporo-parietal junction on pain empathy. Neuropsychologia. 2017; 1(100): 110-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.04.021]
37. Darby RR, Pascual-Leone A. Moral enhancement using non-invasive brain stimulation. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2017; 22(11): 77. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2017.00077]
38. Sellaro R, Nitsche MA, Colzato LS. The stimulated social brain: effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on social cognition. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2016; 1369(1): 218-39. [DOI:10.1111/nyas.13098]
39. Yuan H, Tabarak S, Su W, Liu Y, Yu J, Lei X. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the medial prefrontal cortex affects judgments of moral violations. Frontiers in psychology. 2017; 26(8): 1812. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01812]
40. Delavar A. Theoretical and practical research in the humanities and social sciences. 7th ed. Tehran: Roshd Publisher; 2008.
41. Hommersen P, Murray C, Ohan JL, Johnston C. Oppositional defiant disorder rating scale: preliminary evidence of reliability and validity. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders. 2006; 14(2): 118-25. [DOI:10.1177/10634266060140020201]
42. Faramarzi S, Abedi A, Ghanbari A. Mother communication patterns and oppositional defiant disorder of children. Medical Journal of Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. 2012: 34(2): 90-6.
43. Dadds MR, Hunter K, Hawes DJ, Frost AD, Vassallo S, Bunn P, Merz S, El Masry Y. A measure of cognitive and affective empathy in children using parent ratings. Child psychiatry and human development. 2008; 39(2): 111-22. [DOI:10.1007/s10578-007-0075-4]
44. Lui JH, Barry CT, Sacco DF. Callous-unemotional traits and empathy deficits: Mediating effects of affective perspective-taking and facial emotion recognition. Cognition and emotion. 2016; 30(6): 1049-62. [DOI:10.1080/02699931.2015.1047327]
45. Khanjani Z, Shariati M, Amin Y. Comparing empathy in 5-11 years old children with internalizing disorders. Journal of Instruction and Evaluation, 2014; 7(27): 39-54.
46. Sinha D, Verma M. Moral Judgment Test. National Psychological Corporation, Agra, Uttar Prasdesh, India. 1971.
47. Sirosi M, Dokanehei fard F, Hasani F. The effect of group storytelling on moral judgment of fourth grade female students in public schools in Tehran. Journal of Psychological Research. 3(11).
48. Nitsche MA, Liebetanz D, Antal A, Lang N, Tergau F, Paulus W. Modulation of cortical excitability by weak direct current stimulation-technical, safety and functional aspects. Supplements to Clinical neurophysiology. 2003; 56: 255-76. [DOI:10.1016/S1567-424X(09)70230-2]
49. Boggio PS, Zaghi S, Fregni F. Modulation of emotions associated with images of human pain using anodal transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS). Neuropsychologia. 2009; 47(1): 212-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.07.022]
50. Sadeghi Bimorgh M, Omidi A, Ghoreishi FS, Rezaei Ardani A, Ghaderi A, Banafshe HR. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Relapse, Anxiety, and Depression in Patients With Opioid Dependence Under Methadone Maintenance Treatment: A Pilot Study. Frontiers in pharmacology. 2020; 3(11): 401. [DOI:10.3389/fphar.2020.00401]
51. Workman CD, Fietsam AC, Rudroff T. Different Effects of 2 mA and 4 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Muscle Activity and Torque in a Maximal Isokinetic Fatigue Task. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2020; 25(14): 240. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2020.00240]
52. Maréchal MA, Cohn A, Ugazio G, Ruff CC. Increasing honesty in humans with noninvasive brain stimulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2017; 114(17): 4360-4. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1614912114]
53. Cohen Kadosh R. Modulating and enhancing cognition using brain stimulation: Science and fiction. Journal of Cognitive Psychology. 2015; 27(2): 141-63. [DOI:10.1080/20445911.2014.996569]
54. Preller KH, Hulka LM, Vonmoos M, Jenni D, Baumgartner MR, Seifritz E, Dziobek I, Quednow BB. Impaired emotional empathy and related social network deficits in cocaine users. Addiction biology. 2014; 19(3): 452-66. [DOI:10.1111/adb.12070]
55. Giancola PR. Executive functioning and alcohol-related aggression. Journal of abnormal psychology. 2004; 113(4): 541. [DOI:10.1037/0021-843X.113.4.541]
56. Damasio AR. Descartes' error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York,NY: GP Putnam's Sons. 1994.
57. Massey SH, Stern D, Alden EC, Petersen JE, Cobia DJ, Wang L, Csernansky JG, Smith MJ. Cortical thickness of neural substrates supporting cognitive empathy in individuals with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia research. 2017 1(179): 119-24. [DOI:10.1016/j.schres.2016.09.025]
58. Smith MJ, Horan WP, Cobia DJ, Karpouzian TM, Fox JM, Reilly JL, Breiter HC. Performance-based empathy mediates the influence of working memory on social competence in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia bulletin. 2014; 40(4): 824-34. [DOI:10.1093/schbul/sbt084]
59. Wu X, Xu F, Chen X, Wang L, Huang W, Wan K, Ji GJ, Xiao G, Xu S, Yu F, Zhu C. The Effect of High-definition transcranial direct current stimulation of the right inferior frontal gyrus on empathy in healthy individuals. Frontiers in human neuroscience. 2018; 12(12): 446. [DOI:10.3389/fnhum.2018.00446]
60. Fogassi L, Ferrari PF, Gesierich B, Rozzi S, Chersi F, Rizzolatti G. Parietal lobe: from action organization to intention understanding. Science. 2005; 308(5722): 662-7. [DOI:10.1126/science.1106138]
61. Jackson PL, Meltzoff AN, Decety J. How do we perceive the pain of others? A window into the neural processes involved in empathy. Neuroimage. 2005; 24(3): 771-9. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.006]
62. Knoch D, Nitsche MA, Fischbacher U, Eisenegger C, Pascual-Leone A, Fehr E. Studying the neurobiology of social interaction with transcranial direct current stimulation the example of punishing unfairness. Cerebral cortex. 2008; 18(9): 1987-90. [DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhm237]
63. Madhavan S, Shah B. Enhancing motor skill learning with transcranial direct current stimulation-a concise review with applications to stroke. Frontiers in psychiatry. 2012; 12(3): 66. [DOI:10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00066]
64. Kuehne M, Heimrath K, Heinze HJ, Zaehle T. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex shifts preference of moral judgments. PloS one. 2015; 10(5): e0127061. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0127061]
65. Tassy S, Oullier O, Duclos Y, Coulon O, Mancini J, Deruelle C, Attarian S, Felician O, Wicker B. Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. Social cognitive and affective neuroscience. 2012; 7(3): 282-8. [DOI:10.1093/scan/nsr008]
66. Marshall L, Mölle M, Siebner HR, Born J. Bifrontal transcranial direct current stimulation slows reaction time in a working memory task. BMC neuroscience. 2005; 6(1): 1-7. [DOI:10.1186/1471-2202-6-23]
67. Oliveira JF, Zanão TA, Valiengo L, Lotufo PA, Benseñor IM, Fregni F, Brunoni AR. Acute working memory improvement after tDCS in antidepressant-free patients with major depressive disorder. Neuroscience letters. 2013; 14(537): 60-4. [DOI:10.1016/j.neulet.2013.01.023]
68. Barbey AK, Koenigs M, Grafman J. Dorsolateral prefrontal contributions to human working memory. cortex. 2013; 49(5): 1195-205. [DOI:10.1016/j.cortex.2012.05.022]
69. Eslamizade MJ, Behbahanian S, Mahdavi M, Oftadehal M. An Introduction to Neurotechnologies, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: Their Applications in the Cognitive Enhancement and Rehabilitation. Shefaye Khatam. 2016; 4(2): 65-86. [DOI:10.18869/acadpub.shefa.4.2.65]

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
ghadiri sourman abadi F, ebrahimzadeh K, anvari anbi S, ghazanfari N. The Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation on Empathy and Moral Judgment of Children with Oppositional Defiant Disorder. Shefaye Khatam 2021; 10 (1) :45-55
URL: http://shefayekhatam.ir/article-1-2213-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 10, Issue 1 (Winter 2021) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم اعصاب شفای خاتم The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.08 seconds with 47 queries by YEKTAWEB 4660