1. Dexter F, Candiotti KA. Multicenter assessment of the Iowa Satisfaction with anesthesia scale, an instrument that measures patient satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care. Anesth Analg. 2011;113(2):364-8. [ DOI:10.1213/ANE.0b013e318217f804] 2. Pardo Jr. Local anesthesia. MillerRonald D, Manuel C, Pardo Jr. Basic of Anesthesia. 6th ed. California San Francisco: Elsevier; 2011. P. 740-1. 3. Katz J, Feldman MA, Bass EB, Lubomski LH, Tielsch JM, Petty BG, et al. Injectable versus topical anesthesia for cataract surgery: patient perceptions of pain and side effects. the study of medical testing for cataract surgery study team.Ophthalmology. 2000;107(11):2054-60. [ DOI:10.1016/S0161-6420(00)00359-6] 4. Leaming DV. Practice styles and preferences of ASCRS members--2003 survey. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2004;30(4):892-900. [ DOI:10.1016/j.jcrs.2004.02.064] 5. Amiraslanzadeh Gh GD, Parish M, Nourinia R, Sedaghat K. Evaluation of effectiveness and safety of lidocaine gel as anesthetic. M J Tabriz University of Medical Sciences. 2008;30(2):25-8. 6. Johnston RL, Sparrow JM, Canning CR, Tole D, Price NC. Pilot national electronic cataract surgery survey: i. method, descriptive, and process features. Eye (Lond). 2005;19(7):788-94. [ DOI:10.1038/sj.eye.6701644] 7. Nwosu SN, Nwosu VO, Anajekwu C, Ezenwa A. Retrobulbar versus subconjunctival anesthesia for cataract surgery. Niger J Clin Pract. 2011;14(3):280-3. [ DOI:10.4103/1119-3077.86767] 8. Candiotti KA, Bergese SD, Bokesch PM, Feldman MA, Wisemandle W, Bekker AY, et al. Monitored anesthesia care with dexmedetomidine: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial. Anesth Analg.2010;110:47-56. [ DOI:10.1213/ane.0b013e3181ae0856] 9. Chanthong P, Abrishami A, Wong J, Chung F. Patient satisfaction in ambulatory anesthesia: a systamatic review. Canadian J Anesthesia. 2008;55: 4715771-2. [ DOI:10.1007/BF03016401] 10. Lee EJ, Khandwala M, Jones CA. A randomised controlled trial to compare patient satisfaction with two different types of local anaesthesia in ptosis surgery. Orbit. 2009;28(6):388-91. [ DOI:10.3109/01676830903071240] 11. Ahmad N, Zahoor A, Motowa SA, Jastaneiah S, Riad W. Satisfaction level with topical versus peribulbar anesthesia experienced by same patient for phacoemulsification. Saudi J Anaesthesia. 2012;6(4): 363-6. [ DOI:10.4103/1658-354X.105866] 12. Masood N, Saleem MA, Masroor R, Uddin S. Evaluation patient's satisfaction of anesthesia care. Pakistan J MED. 2008;2(5):41. 13. Chan WH,Biswas S, Lloyd IC,Wraith E, Jones S,Mercer J, et al. What makes a good operation great? factors determining patient satisfaction with local anaesthesia in cataract surgery. J Eye. 2013;27(9):1112-4. [ DOI:10.1038/eye.2013.109] 14. Fung D, Cohen M, Stewart S, Davies A. Can the iowa satisfaction with anesthesia scale be used to measure patient satisfaction with cataract care under topical local anesthesia and monitored sedation at a community hospital? Anesth Analg. 2005;100(6):1637-43. [ DOI:10.1213/01.ANE.0000154203.00434.23] 15. Baroudi D, Nofal W. Patient safety in anesthesia. Internet J Health. 2009; 8(2): 124-43. 16. Dexter F, Aker J, Wright WA. Development of a measure of patient satisfaction with monitored anesthesia care: the iowa satisfaction with anesthesia scale. Anesthesiology. 1997; 87(4): 856-64. [ DOI:10.1097/00000542-199710000-00021] 17. Kalkman CJ, Visser K, Moen J, Bonsel GJ, Grobbee DE, Moons KGM. Preoperative prediction of severe postoperative painPain. 2003; 105(3): 415-23. 18. García LFJ, Capera ADR. Validation to spanish of the iowa satisfaction with anesthesia scale (isas) for monitored anesthesia care in ophthalmic surgery. Colombian Journal of Anesthesiology. 2014;42(4):272-80. [ DOI:10.1097/01819236-201442040-00005] 19. Barnett SF, Alagar RK, Grocott MP, Giannaris S, Dick JR, MoonesingheSR. Patient-satisfaction measures in anesthesia qualitative: systematic review. Anesthesiology. 2013;119(2):452-78. [ DOI:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3182976014] 20. Bell DM, Halliburton JR, Preston JC. An evaluation of anesthesia patient satisfaction instruments. AANA J. 2004;72:211-7.
|