[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles Archive::
Guide for Authors::
For Reviewers::
Ethical Statements::
Registration::
Site Facilities::
Contact us::
::
Indexed by
    
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Copyright Policies

 

AWT IMAGE

 

..
Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

..
:: Volume 12, Issue 3 (Summer 2024) ::
Shefaye Khatam 2024, 12(3): 10-20 Back to browse issues page
Exploring the Synergistic Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Mindfulness Meditation on Anxiety Responses to Induced Rumination
Vahideh Momeniyan , Ali Ghanaeichamanabad * , , mohammad saeed Abdkhodaei , Zahra Tabibi
Department of Psychology and Research Core of Cognitive Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran , ghanaee@um.ac.ir
Abstract:   (568 Views)
Introduction: transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and mindfulness are two commonly used interventions for targeting cognitive processes related to emotional pathology. Materials and Methods: The current research is applied and quasi-experimental. The population was students aged 19 to 26 at Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Among them, 60 healthy college students were selected through a purposive sampling method according to the stress, anxiety, and depression scale and were randomly assigned to 4 groups. In this study, we examined how tDCS in combination with mindfulness influenced the anxiety reactivity to induced rumination. All populations received either active or sham anodal tDCS to DLPFC or active or sham cathodal tDCS to the IPL, delivered either in active or sham mindfulness meditation. anxiety was assessed 5 times across the study. To collect data, the Spielberger State-Anxiety Inventory was completed by each participant. In the end, the data were analyzed descriptively by mean and standard deviation and inferentially by mixed variance analysis. Results: The between-group analysis revealed that after a single session of tDCS combined with mindfulness meditation, there were no significant differences in anxiety scores across the five stages. However, the within-subject analysis indicated significant changes in anxiety levels across the five assessment times. Conclusion: Concurrent single sessions of tDCS and mindfulness in the form of a body scan did not create a significant difference between the groups in any of the anxiety assessment times. However, with the continuation of mindfulness in the form of focusing on breathing, there were significant differences in the level of anxiety response compared to the previous stage
 
Keywords: Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, Parietal Lobe, Emotions, Pathology
Full-Text [PDF 1556 kb]   (185 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research --- Open Access, CC-BY-NC | Subject: Cognitive Neuroscience
References
1. Fair L. Analyzing the Unique Role of Repetitive Negative Thinking on Insomnia in College Students. 2023.
2. Nolen-Hoeksema S, Wisco BE, Lyubomirsky S. Rethinking rumination. Perspectives on psychological science. 2008;3(5):400-24. [DOI:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x]
3. Du J, Huang J, An Y, Xu W. The relationship between stress and negative emotion: The mediating role of rumination. Clinical Research and Trials. 2018;4(1):1-5. [DOI:10.15761/CRT.1000208]
4. Rosenbaum D, Int-Veen I, Rubel J, Laicher H, Kroczek A, Lawyer G, et al. Associations of different emotion regulation strategies with coping-efficacy, rumination and stress. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2022;46(5):889-901. [DOI:10.1007/s10608-022-10307-y]
5. Zuzama N, Fiol-Veny A, Roman-Juan J, Balle M. Emotion regulation style and daily rumination: potential mediators between affect and both depression and anxiety during adolescence. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. 2020;17(18):6614. [DOI:10.3390/ijerph17186614]
6. Nolen‐Hoeksema S. The response styles theory. Depressive rumination: Nature, theory and treatment. 2003:105-23. [DOI:10.1002/9780470713853.ch6]
7. Roberts H, Watkins ER, Wills AJ. Cueing an unresolved personal goal causes persistent ruminative self-focus: An experimental evaluation of control theories of rumination. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry. 2013;44(4):449-55. [DOI:10.1016/j.jbtep.2013.05.004]
8. Herguedas AJU. Non-pharmacological interventions in preventive, rehabilitative and restorative medicine. Alternative Medicine-Update. 2021.
9. Divarco R, Ramasawmy P, Petzke F, Antal A. Stimulated brains and meditative minds: A systematic review on combining low intensity transcranial electrical stimulation and meditation in humans. International Journal of Clinical and Health Psychology. 2023;23(3):100369. [DOI:10.1016/j.ijchp.2023.100369]
10. Beck AT, Bredemeier K. A unified model of depression: Integrating clinical, cognitive, biological, and evolutionary perspectives. Clinical Psychological Science. 2016;4(4):596-619. [DOI:10.1177/2167702616628523]
11. Hosseinpour H, Akbari M, Hassani J, Zargar F. The efficacy of pharmacotherapy combined with short-term mindfulness therapy on the reduction of migraine disability and improvement of sleep quality. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2020;8(2):18-28. [DOI:10.29252/shefa.8.2.18]
12. Akbarpour M, Sharifiyan Ghazijahani M, Esmkhani Akbarinejhad H. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Min Dfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy with Compassion-Focused Therapy on Resilience and Psychological Well-Being of Subjects with Multiple Sclerosis. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2021;9(4):60-70. [DOI:10.52547/shefa.9.4.60]
13. Brunoni AR, Nitsche MA, Bolognini N, Bikson M, Wagner T, Merabet L, et al. Clinical research with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS): challenges and future directions. Brain stimulation. 2012;5(3):175-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2011.03.002]
14. Fornito A, Harrison BJ, Zalesky A, Simons JS. Competitive and cooperative dynamics of large-scale brain functional networks supporting recollection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2012;109(31):12788-93. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1204185109]
15. Bishop SJ. Neurocognitive mechanisms of anxiety: an integrative account. Trends in cognitive sciences. 2007;11(7):307-16. [DOI:10.1016/j.tics.2007.05.008]
16. Peña-Gómez C, Vidal-Pineiro D, Clemente IC, Pascual-Leone A, Bartres-Faz D. Down-regulation of negative emotional processing by transcranial direct current stimulation: effects of personality characteristics. PloS one. 2011;6(7):e22812. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0022812]
17. Eldaief MC, Halko MA, Buckner RL, Pascual-Leone A. Transcranial magnetic stimulation modulates the brain's intrinsic activity in a frequency-dependent manner. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(52):21229-34. [DOI:10.1073/pnas.1113103109]
18. Hoebeke Y, Desmedt O, Özçimen B, Heeren A. The impact of transcranial Direct Current stimulation on rumination: A systematic review of the sham-controlled studies in healthy and clinical samples. Comprehensive Psychiatry. 2021;106:152226. [DOI:10.1016/j.comppsych.2021.152226]
19. Chou T, Hooley JM, Camprodon JA. Transcranial direct current stimulation of default mode network parietal nodes decreases negative mind-wandering about the past. Cognitive Therapy and Research. 2020;44(1):10-20. [DOI:10.1007/s10608-019-10044-9]
20. Kajimura S, Kochiyama T, Nakai R, Abe N, Nomura M. Causal relationship between effective connectivity within the default mode network and mind-wandering regulation and facilitation. Neuroimage. 2016;133:21-30. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.03.009]
21. McLaughlin KA, Borkovec TD, Sibrava NJ. The effects of worry and rumination on affect states and cognitive activity. Behavior Therapy. 2007;38(1):23-38. [DOI:10.1016/j.beth.2006.03.003]
22. Lovibond PF, Lovibond SH. The structure of negative emotional states: Comparison of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS) with the Beck Depression and Anxiety Inventories. Behaviour research and therapy. 1995;33(3):335-43. [DOI:10.1016/0005-7967(94)00075-U]
23. Bottesi G, Ghisi M, Altoè G, Conforti E, Melli G, Sica C. The Italian version of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21: Factor structure and psychometric properties on community and clinical samples. Comprehensive psychiatry. 2015;60:170-81. [DOI:10.1016/j.comppsych.2015.04.005]
24. Wang H-T, Poerio G, Murphy C, Bzdok D, Jefferies E, Smallwood J. Dimensions of experience: exploring the heterogeneity of the wandering mind. Psychological science. 2018;29(1):56-71. [DOI:10.1177/0956797617728727]
25. Osman A, Wong JL, Bagge CL, Freedenthal S, Gutierrez PM, Lozano G. The depression anxiety stress Scales-21 (DASS‐21): further examination of dimensions, scale reliability, and correlates. Journal of clinical psychology. 2012;68(12):1322-38. [DOI:10.1002/jclp.21908]
26. Spielberger CD. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (self-evaluation questionnaire). (No Title). 1970.
27. Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six‐item short‐form of the state scale of the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). British journal of clinical Psychology. 1992;31(3):301-6. [DOI:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1992.tb00997.x]
28. Alon Y, Naim R, Pine DS, Bliese PD, Bar‐Haim Y. Validity of attention bias variability indices for posttraumatic stress disorder research: Evidence from patient data. Journal of Traumatic Stress. 2019;32(5):791-8. [DOI:10.1002/jts.22443]
29. Brunoni AR, Vanderhasselt M-A, Boggio PS, Fregni F, Dantas EM, Mill JG, et al. Polarity-and valence-dependent effects of prefrontal transcranial direct current stimulation on heart rate variability and salivary cortisol. Psychoneuroendocrinology. 2013;38(1):58-66. [DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2012.04.020]
30. Marques LM, Morello LY, Boggio PS. Ventrolateral but not dorsolateral prefrontal cortex tDCS effectively impact emotion reappraisal-effects on emotional experience and interbeat interval. Scientific reports. 2018;8(1):15295. [DOI:10.1038/s41598-018-33711-5]
31. Yin J, Tang L, Dishman RK. The effects of a single session of mindful exercise on anxiety: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Mental Health and Physical Activity. 2021;21:100403. [DOI:10.1016/j.mhpa.2021.100403]
32. Khoury B, Lecomte T, Fortin G, Masse M, Therien P, Bouchard V, et al. Mindfulness-based therapy: a comprehensive meta-analysis. Clinical psychology review. 2013;33(6):763-71. [DOI:10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005]
33. Grant JA, Zeidan F. Employing pain and mindfulness to understand consciousness: a symbiotic relationship. Current opinion in psychology. 2019;28:192-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.12.025]
34. Strohmaier S. The relationship between doses of mindfulness-based programs and depression, anxiety, stress, and mindfulness: A dose-response meta-regression of randomized controlled trials. Mindfulness. 2020;11:1315-35. [DOI:10.1007/s12671-020-01319-4]
35. Danilewitz M, Gao S, Salehinejad MA, Ge R, Nitsche MA, Vila-Rodriguez F. Effect of combined yoga and transcranial direct current stimulation intervention on working memory and mindfulness. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience. 2021;20(2):367-74. [DOI:10.31083/j.jin2002036]
36. Burton A, Burgess C, Dean S, Koutsopoulou GZ, Hugh‐Jones S. How effective are mindfulness‐based interventions for reducing stress among healthcare professionals? A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Stress and Health. 2017;33(1):3-13. [DOI:10.1002/smi.2673]
37. Sharma PK, Kumra R. Relationship between mindfulness, depression, anxiety and stress: Mediating role of self-efficacy. Personality and Individual Differences. 2022;186:111363. [DOI:10.1016/j.paid.2021.111363]
38. Jaiswal S, Muggleton NG, Juan C-H, Liang W-K. Indices of association between anxiety and mindfulness: A guide for future mindfulness studies. Personality neuroscience. 2019;2:e9. [DOI:10.1017/pen.2019.12]
39. Geiger PJ, Boggero IA, Brake CA, Caldera CA, Combs HL, Peters JR, et al. Mindfulness-based interventions for older adults: A review of the effects on physical and emotional well-being. Mindfulness. 2016;7:296-307. [DOI:10.1007/s12671-015-0444-1]
40. Kang Y, Rahrig H, Eichel K, Niles HF, Rocha T, Lepp NE, et al. Gender differences in response to a school-based mindfulness training intervention for early adolescents. Journal of school psychology. 2018;68:163-76. [DOI:10.1016/j.jsp.2018.03.004]
41. Mehrsafar AH, Strahler J, Gazerani P, Khabiri M, Sánchez JCJ, Moosakhani A, et al. The effects of mindfulness training on competition-induced anxiety and salivary stress markers in elite Wushu athletes: A pilot study. Physiology & behavior. 2019;210:112655. [DOI:10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.112655]
42. Jalilvand M, Souri R, Solimanitabar M. The effectiveness of yoga exercises on anxiety and depression in patients with psoriasis. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2021;9(2):60-7. [DOI:10.52547/shefa.9.2.60]



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

momeniyan V, ghanaeichamanabad A, Abdkhodaei , M S, tabibi Z. Exploring the Synergistic Impact of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Mindfulness Meditation on Anxiety Responses to Induced Rumination. Shefaye Khatam 2024; 12 (3) :10-20
URL: http://shefayekhatam.ir/article-1-2484-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 3 (Summer 2024) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم اعصاب شفای خاتم The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.11 seconds with 47 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710