[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
About the Journal & Policies
Editorial Board
Articles Archive::
Current Issue
All Issues
Guide for Authors::
Author instructions
Guide for publishing in journal
Submission Form
Author's consent form
For Reviewers::
Reviewers Section
Ethical Statements::
Registration::
Registration Form
Site Facilities::
Site map
Inform to friends
Contact us::
Contact Information
::
Indexed by
    
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Copyright Policies

 

AWT IMAGE

 
..
Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.

..
:: Volume 12, Issue 4 (Autumn 2024) ::
Shefaye Khatam 2024, 12(4): 43-55 Back to browse issues page
Comparing the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation program with transcranial electrical stimulation on brain waves of children with math learning disorder
Nazila Broumand Esfangarh , Saeed Rezayi * , Ali Jahan , Mohammad Reza Ghasemian Moghadam
Department of Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Allameh Tabatabai University, Tehran, Iran , rezayi.saeed10@gmail.com
Abstract:   (573 Views)
Introduction: As a specific learning disorder, mathematical learning disorder is an obstacle to learning mathematics and is associated with problems in remembering numerical facts, accurate and fluent calculation, and mathematical reasoning. The present study was conducted to compare the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation programs and transcranial electrical stimulation intervention on the brain waves of children with math learning disorders. Materials and Methods: Thirty students, aged 6 to 10, from Tabriz with learning disabilities, were randomly selected based on inclusion/exclusion criteria using clinical interviews, academic record observations, and the Wechsler IQ test. The study employed a semi-experimental, multi-group pre-test/post-test design. To collect data, Wechsler's children's intelligence scale was used to evaluate normal intelligence as a control variable, and working memory and processing speed scales were used to diagnose learning disorders. After randomly assigning them to the groups, before the intervention, brain waves were recorded with electroencephalography, which were considered as pre-test scores. Then, each of the experimental groups participated separately in the digital cognitive rehabilitation program sessions and transcranial direct current stimulation, while the control group did not receive any intervention during this period. After completing the interventions, brain waves were recorded again in all 3 groups and the obtained scores were considered as post-test. Finally, the pre-test and post-test were analyzed. Results: The results indicated that both the cognitive rehabilitation program and transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) effectively reduced the absolute power of the frontal theta wave and increased the absolute power of the occipital alpha wave in children with math learning disorders. However, transcranial direct current stimulation showed a greater effectiveness compared to the cognitive rehabilitation program. Conclusion: Transcranial direct current stimulation is an effective treatment for math learning disorders and may be considered a preferred option by specialists in this field.
 
Keywords: Cognitive Training, Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation, Learning Disabilities
Full-Text [PDF 1796 kb]   (200 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research --- Open Access, CC-BY-NC | Subject: Neurorehabilation
References
1. American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®): American Psychiatric Pub; 2013. [DOI:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596]
2. Xuefang L, Guihua W, Fengru M. The effect of early cognitive training and rehabilitation for patients with cognitive dysfunction in stroke. International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research. 2021; 30(3): e1882. [DOI:10.1002/mpr.1882]
3. Khaleghi A, Naderi F, Joharifard R, Javadzadeh M. Comparing the Effectiveness of Task-Oriented Cognitive Rehabilitation and Computer-Based Cognitive Rehabilitation Programs on Cognitive Flexibility in Children with Epilepsy. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2023; 11(3): 25-35. [DOI:10.61186/shefa.11.3.25]
4. Nejati V, Shahidi S, Helmi S. Enhancement of Executive Functions with Cognitive Rehabilitation in Older Adults. Journal of Modern Rehabilitation. 2017; 10(3).
5. Geary DC. Role of Cognitive Theory in the Study of Learning Disability in Mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities. 2005; 38(4): 305-7. [DOI:10.1177/00222194050380040401]
6. Holland R, Crinion J. Can tDCS enhance treatment of aphasia after stroke? Aphasiology. 2012; 26(9): 1169-91. [DOI:10.1080/02687038.2011.616925]
7. Krafnick AJ, Flowers DL, Napoliello EM, Eden GF. Gray matter volume changes following reading intervention in dyslexic children. Neuroimage. 2011; 57(3): 733-41. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.062]
8. Kucian K, Grond U, Rotzer S, Henzi B, Schönmann C, Plangger F, et al. Mental number line training in children with developmental dyscalculia. Neuroimage. 2011; 57(3): 782-95. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.070]
9. Fritsch B, Reis J, Martinowich K, Schambra HM, Ji Y, Cohen LG, et al. Direct current stimulation promotes BDNF-dependent synaptic plasticity: potential implications for motor learning. Neuron. 2010; 66(2): 198-204. [DOI:10.1016/j.neuron.2010.03.035]
10. Kawashima R, Okita K, Yamazaki R, Tajima N, Yoshida H, Taira M, et al. Reading aloud and arithmetic calculation improve frontal function of people with dementia. The journals of gerontology. 2005; 60(3): 380-4. [DOI:10.1093/gerona/60.3.380]
11. Chang YK, Labban JD, Gapin JI, Etnier JL. The effects of acute exercise on cognitive performance: a meta-analysis. Brain Research. 2012; 1453: 87-101. [DOI:10.1016/j.brainres.2012.02.068]
12. Soga K, Kamijo K, Masaki H. Effects of acute exercise on executive function in children with and without neurodevelopmental disorders. The Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine. 2016; 5(1): 57-67. [DOI:10.7600/jpfsm.5.57]
13. Turkeltaub PE, Benson J, Hamilton RH, Datta A, Bikson M, Coslett HB. Left lateralizing transcranial direct current stimulation improves reading efficiency. Brain Stimulus. 2012; 5(3): 201-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2011.04.002]
14. Cohen Kadosh R, Soskic S, Iuculano T, Kanai R, Walsh V. Modulating neuronal activity produces specific and long-lasting changes in numerical competence. Current Biology. 2010; 20(22): 2016-20. [DOI:10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.007]
15. Krause B, Cohen Kadosh R. Can transcranial electrical stimulation improve learning difficulties in atypical brain development? A future possibility for cognitive training. Developmental cognitive neuroscience. 2013; 6: 176-94. [DOI:10.1016/j.dcn.2013.04.001]
16. Wagner T, Valero-Cabre A, Pascual-Leone A. Noninvasive human brain stimulation. Annual Review of Biomedical Engineering. 2007; 9: 527-65. [DOI:10.1146/annurev.bioeng.9.061206.133100]
17. Asadollahzadeh Shamkhal F, Moghimi A, Kobravi H, Salehi Fadardi J. The Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Linear and Nonlinear EEG Signal Characteristics in Contamination Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Patients. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2023; 12(1): 22-33. [DOI:10.61186/shefa.12.1.22]
18. Mahdavi A, Ahmadi F, Haj Abbas Tabrizi E, Gharaian H, Rigi Koote B, Imaninasab V, et al. Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES): History, Theoretical Foundations and Applications. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2022; 11(1): 69-104. [DOI:10.52547/shefa.11.1.69]
19. Szűcs D, Goswami U. Developmental dyscalculia: Fresh perspectives. Trends in Neuroscience and Education. 2013; 2: 33-7. [DOI:10.1016/j.tine.2013.06.004]
20. Weisberg DS, Keil FC, Goodstein J, Rawson E, Gray JR. The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J Cogn Neurosci. 2008; 20(3): 470-7. [DOI:10.1162/jocn.2008.20040]
21. Livint Popa L, Dragos H, Pantelemon C, Verisezan Rosu O, Strilciuc S. The Role of Quantitative EEG in the Diagnosis of Neuropsychiatric Disorders. The Journal of Medicine and Life. 2020; 13(1): 8-15. [DOI:10.25122/jml-2019-0085]
22. Kamkari K, Shekarzadeh S, Afruz G, Helat A. Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children -WISC - IV: Original and Substitute Tests. Edition F, editor: Tehran, Elm Ostadan Pub.; 2014.
23. Kaufman AS, Kaufman JC, Balgopal R, McLean JE. Comparison of three WISC-III short forms: Weighing psychometric, clinical, and practical factors. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology. 1996; 25(1): 97-105. [DOI:10.1207/s15374424jccp2501_11]
24. Abedi M, Sadeghi A, Rabiei M. Standardization of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children - IV in Chahar Mahal Va Bakhteyri State. Personality and individual difference. 2013; 2(3): 138-58.
25. Hauser TU, Rütsche B, Wurmitzer K, Brem S, Ruff CC, Grabner RH. Neurocognitive Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Arithmetic Learning and Performance: A Simultaneous tDCS-fMRI Study. Brain Stimul. 2016; 9(6): 850-8. [DOI:10.1016/j.brs.2016.07.007]
26. Herwig U, Satrapi P, Schönfeldt-Lecuona C. Using the international 10-20 EEG system for positioning of transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain Topography. 2003; 16(2): 95-9. [DOI:10.1023/B:BRAT.0000006333.93597.9d]
27. van de Ven RM, Buitenweg JI, Schmand B, Veltman DJ, Aaronson JA, Nijboer TC, et al. Brain training improves recovery after stroke but waiting list improves equally: A multicenter randomized controlled trial of a computer-based cognitive flexibility training. PLoS One. 2017; 12(3): e0172993. [DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0172993]
28. Ahmadi N GZHA, hydari S. Comparison of the efficacy of brain electrical stimulation and cognitive rehabilitation on eye-hand coordination of children with special learning disabilities aged 7 to 13 years. Journal of Psychological Science. 2023; 22(128): 1587-99.
29. Rahimi M, Heidari A, Naderi F, Makvandi B, Bakhtiyarpour S. Comparison of Cognitive Training Method and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on the Visual Attention Processes in the Students with Special Learning Disorders. International Journal of Behavioral Sciences. 2019; 12(4): 162-8.
30. Li LM, Uehara K, Hanakawa T. The contribution of interindividual factors to variability of response in transcranial direct current stimulation studies. Front Cell Neuroscine. 2015; 9: 181. [DOI:10.3389/fncel.2015.00181]
31. Bakker M, van den Heuvel-Panhuizen M, Robitzsch A. Effects of mathematics computer games on special education students' multiplicative reasoning ability. British Journal of Educational Technology. 2016; 47: 633-48. [DOI:10.1111/bjet.12249]
32. Chen C-H, Law V. Scaffolding individual and collaborative game-based learning in learning performance and intrinsic motivation. Computers in Human Behavior. 2015; 55. [DOI:10.1016/j.chb.2015.03.010]
33. Imlig-Iten N, Petko D. Learning with serious games: Is fun playing the game a predictor of learning success? British Journal of Educational Technology. 2014; 47: 151-63. [DOI:10.1111/bjet.12226]
34. Hung C-M, Huang I, Hwang G-J. Effects of digital game-based learning on students' self-efficacy, motivation, anxiety, and achievements in learning mathematics. Journal of Computers in Education. 2014; 1: 151-66. [DOI:10.1007/s40692-014-0008-8]
35. Pope H, Mangram C. Wuzzit Trouble: The Influence of a Digital Math Game on Student Number Sense. International Journal of Serious Games. 2015; 2. [DOI:10.17083/ijsg.v2i4.88]
36. Bergo E, Lombardi G, Pambuku A, Della Puppa A, Bellu L, D'Avella D, et al. Cognitive Rehabilitation in Patients with Gliomas and Other Brain Tumors: State of the Art. BioMed Research International. 2016; 2016: 3041824. [DOI:10.1155/2016/3041824]
37. Ghanbari E, Asgari P. Comparison of the effectiveness of tDCS and CBT treatments on Attention Bias in overweight people. Journal of the Faculty of Medicine Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2020; 1(63): 2208-197.
38. Shamsi Holasu M, Tabatabaei M, Azmodeh M. The Effectiveness of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on the Executive Functions of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2023; 11(2): 20-31. [DOI:10.61186/shefa.11.2.20]
39. Zandkarimi G, Fazlali F, Hasanvand MB. Cognitive Abilities Preferment in Math Problem-Solving through Combined Neuro-Feedback and Trans Cranial Electrical Stimulation Therapy. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2022; 10(4): 20-31. [DOI:10.52547/shefa.10.4.20]
40. mohammadzadeghan r, Farid A, Chalabianlu Hasratanlo G, Mesrabadi J. Comparison of the Effectiveness of Mindfulness-Based Social-Emotional Learning Program with/and without Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation on Emotional Self-Regulation and Problem-Solving Performance in Students with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam. 2023; 11(2): 52-64. [DOI:10.61186/shefa.11.2.52]

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Broumand Esfangarh N, Rezayi S, Jahan A, Ghasemian Moghadam M R. Comparing the effectiveness of cognitive rehabilitation program with transcranial electrical stimulation on brain waves of children with math learning disorder. Shefaye Khatam 2024; 12 (4) :43-55
URL: http://shefayekhatam.ir/article-1-2513-en.html
Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 12, Issue 4 (Autumn 2024) Back to browse issues page
مجله علوم اعصاب شفای خاتم The Neuroscience Journal of Shefaye Khatam
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.06 seconds with 47 queries by YEKTAWEB 4710